Please purchase a subscription to read our premium content. If you have a subscription, please log in or sign up for an account on our website to continue.
Please log in, or sign up for a new account to continue reading.
Thank you for reading! We hope that you continue to enjoy our free content.
Sunny. High 94F. Winds SE at 5 to 10 mph..
Clear skies. Low 68F. Winds SE at 5 to 10 mph.
Updated: September 13, 2022 @ 6:14 am
Chicago Sun-Times. September 7, 2022.
Editorial: Bears wrong to expect taxpayers to fund any part of Arlington Heights stadium plan
Given today’s economic climate and the generous windfall the team would reap if the venture is successful, taxpayers shouldn’t fund any portion of the Bears move. Shame on them for even asking.
The Chicago Bears are cracking open their playbook this week, providing a glimpse of the stadium and entertainment complex planned for Arlington Heights.
Master plan renderings of the team’s proposal for the 326-acre former Arlington Park Racetrack site convey the massiveness of the proposed project, but not much detail other than a stadium surrounded by green space, roads and a “mixed-use district” of anonymous-for-now structures.
The Bears say they will build the stadium on their own dime. But be warned: The team wants taxpayer help to get that mixed-use district across the goal line.
“While the Bears will seek no public funding for direct stadium structure construction, given the broad, long-term public benefits of this project, we look forward to partnering with the various governmental bodies to secure additional funding and assistance needed to support the feasibility of the remainder of the development,” the team said in an open letter released Tuesday.
If the Bears, a sports franchise now worth $5 billion — the sixth most valuable NFL team, according to Sportico — can make a better deal and find greener pastures for themselves in Arlington Heights, then good for them.
But the team shouldn’t expect the public’s help paying for any part of the project, especially given the tremendous windfall the organization will reap if the venture is successful.
Given today’s economic climate and the demand on tax dollars for basic services and to balance government budgets, it’s shameful for the Bears to even ask.
Renderings and rosy numbers
The release of the renderings and the letter comes just before Thursday’s public meeting in Arlington Heights on the stadium.
The Bears haven’t yet said how much public money they’ll seek, but we’d wager the “ask” will be substantial given the size of the non-stadium portions of the proposal, as indicated in the renderings.
And the financial numbers released are rosy enough to warrant a section at the Chicago Botanic Gardens: The team promises $9.4 billion in economic impact for the region, part of which is a yearly tax haul of $51 million for the state and $9.8 for Cook County.
“Make no mistake. This is much more than a stadium project,” the Bears said in that open letter. “Any development of Arlington Park will propose to include a multi-purpose entertainment, commercial/retail and housing district that will provide considerable economic benefits to Cook County, the surrounding region and the state of Illinois.”
But sports stadium expert and University of Chicago economics professor Allen Sanderson cast doubt on the numbers — and we agree.
“Whenever anyone is offering up an economic impact number, a good rule of thumb is to move the decimal one place to the left,” Sanderson told Sun-Times reporter Fran Spielman, while noting he hasn’t seen the Bears’ research.
“It doesn’t matter if it’s the Bears, or a local chamber of commerce, or a mayor — 90% of that is hyperbole or just inflated,” he said.
‘Multi-purpose entertainment district’
The Bears signed a $197 million option last September to buy the old Arlington Heights racetrack site with an eye toward moving out of Soldier Field, where the team has been a tenant since 1971.
The Bears’ Soldier Field lease expires in 2033. Reminder: Taxpayers are still on the hook for $400 million of the $606 million stadium renovation in 2003.
At the Arlington Heights site, the team said it envisions a multi-purpose entertainment district with a “best-in-class, enclosed stadium” capable of hosting college football playoffs, the NCAA’s Final Four basketball championships and the Super Bowl.
“The long-term vision for the entire project is an ongoing work in progress, but could include: restaurants, office space, hotel, fitness center, new parks and open spaces and other improvements for the community to enjoy.”
That’s all well and good. But the days of using public funds to assist sports stadium projects must go the way of the leather helmet.
And there are always hidden infrastructure costs to taxpayers in projects like these.
As this editorial board wrote a year ago: “If the Bears move to Arlington Heights, what are the chances the team will pay for the new roads and other infrastructure needed to make the stadium work? About zero. You, the taxpayer, will pay those costs, directly or indirectly.”
Another reminder: Back in the 1970s, the team asked Arlington Heights to issue bonds to build a stadium possibly patterned after the Pontiac Silverdome in Michigan. That deal fell through.
Studies have shown that rosy revenue estimates of the economic impact of sports stadiums simply do not pan out. Even if the Bears master plan and financial projections are as accurate as a Sid Luckman pass, lawmakers should spike any ask for public funds to finance any part of the stadium project.
Especially for a 102-year-old NFL franchise that’s worth billions.
Champaign News-Gazette. September 9, 2022.
Editorial: Education study reveals extent of coronavirus damage
A new report makes the effects of school closings clear.
The mind reels at the social, educational and economic impact of the catastrophic coronavirus pandemic that plagued this country starting in 2020 and that continues to cause problems.
At some point in the future, as has been recommended in the past, this country must establish a nonpolitical investigative commission to study what public-health officials did right and wrong to cope with this threat. It’s fair to predict that the across-the-board damage caused by, among other things, economic lockdowns, school closings and social isolation will be staggering.
But it’s not necessary to wait until the report is in — assuming the powers that be have the stomach to order one — to determine at least part of the hideous price paid.
Officials at the National Assessment of Educational Progress recently reported their findings on the impact of “the lack of in-person classroom education” on children’s math and reading scores.
“Average scores for age 9 students in 2022 declined 5 points in reading and 7 points in mathematics compared to 2020. This is the largest average score decline in reading since 1990, and the first-ever decline in mathematics,” their report states.
“Largest ever decline” in reading and “first-ever decline” in math pretty much says it all about this horrendous self-inflicted wound on the nation’s children.
It goes without saying, but it’s necessary to say it anyhow, that those children struggling the most in the classroom suffered the most educationally because of school closings. The report states that scores for “lower-performing age 9 students declined more (in math and reading) than scores for higher-performing students compared to 2020.”
U.S. Education Secretary Miguel Cardona offered a blinding glimpse of the obvious when he stated that “in-person learning is where we need to focus.”
That’s fine for him to say now. But where were he and other leading educators in 2020 and 2021?
While most private schools remained open for in-person learning, many public schools opted for online learning even though not all their students had access to online classrooms or took it with the seriousness required to advance in the academic arena.
The debate over in-school learning, incredibly, still is not over.
The union representing Chicago teachers made it clear it was not pleased with school re-openings this fall and sought concessions from administrators to return.
Circumstances, thankfully, have improved since then. While still a menace, the coronavirus does not pose the risks it once did. That’s thanks to vaccines, booster shots and natural immunity.
People, of course, should continue to act defensively, particularly those with co-morbidities that make them especially vulnerable. Everyone also should bear in mind of the importance of not making the solution — like school closings — worse than the problem.
END
Copyright 2022 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Your comment has been submitted.
Reported
There was a problem reporting this.
Log In
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.
About Author
