Review your content’s performance and reach.
Become your target audience’s go-to resource for today’s hottest topics.
Understand your clients’ strategies and the most pressing issues they are facing.
Keep a step ahead of your key competitors and benchmark against them.
add to folder:
Questions? Please contact [email protected]
The Owners – Strata Plan No 84674 v Pafburn Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 1002
Key takeout
A person must have ‘carried out construction work’ for the purpose of section 37(1) of the Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 (NSW) (DBP Act) to owe a duty of care to an owner.
In the circumstances of this case, allegations as to whether a person who has concurrent capacities as sole director and thus ‘controlling mind’ of a developer and as the builder’s nominated supervisor, in fact supervised, coordinated and project managed the carrying out of building work or had the ability to control how building work was carried out, should be determined at hearing rather than on an application to summarily dismiss the claim.
Facts
This case further clarifies the decision in The Owners – Strata Plan No 84674 v Pafburn Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 659. Reported here.
The plaintiff is the owners corporation of a strata development in North Sydney (owners corporation). Pafburn Pty Ltd (builder) was the builder of the development and Madarina Pty Limited (developer) was the owner of the land, until the strata plan was registered.
The builder and the developer are related bodies corporate. Relevantly:
The owners corporation commenced proceedings against the builder and the developer claiming that they both acted in breach of the duty of care prescribed by section 37(1) of the DBP Act.
On the previous occasion, the court held that on the proper construction of the DBP Act, a ‘person’ who carries out construction work as referred to in section 37(1) of the DBP Act includes the owner of the land in relation to which the construction work is carried out; and a person ‘otherwise having substantive control’ over the carrying out of any work for the purposes of the definition of ‘construction work’ in the DBP Act includes a person who, as a matter of fact, is ‘able to control how the work is carried out’.
The critical question in this judgment was whether the allegation in the proposed amended list statement that the developer itself ‘carried out construction work’ for the purpose of section 37(1) DBP Act was so obviously untenable that it could not possibly succeed such that the proceedings against the developer should be summarily dismissed. The Owners Corporation sought to establish that the developer ‘carried out construction work’ on the following basis:
Decision
Stevenson J declined to dismiss the proceedings against the developer. It was noted that the jurisdiction to terminate an action is to be used sparingly and is not to be used unless it is a clear case in which the court is satisfied that it has the requisite material and the necessary assistance to reach a definite and certain conclusion that the claim cannot possibly succeed.
Supervising, coordinating and project managing building work
In relation to the proposition that because Mr Obeid concurrently held the positions of sole director and was thus the ‘controlling mind’ of the developer and also the builder’s nominated supervisor he, in his capacity as the sole director and ‘controlling mind’ of the developer, in fact ‘supervised, coordinated and project managed the carrying out of the building work’ Stevenson J held that it may not be made out at the hearing but he could not conclude at this stage that it certainly will not be.
Substantive control
It was considered at least arguable that because Mr Obeid had concurrent capacities as sole director of the developer and the builder’s nominated supervisor, he may, as a matter of fact, and in his capacity as a director of the developer, have had the ability to control how the building work was carried out, and this should be explored at the hearing.
add to folder:
If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email [email protected].
© Copyright 2006 – 2022 Law Business Research
About Author
